Belarus First Level Championships All-Time Table 1992 - 2025
S GP W D L GF- GA Pts %pts Av. Goals % W % D % L
1.Dynama Minsk 35 1000 601 216 183 1808- 829 2019 67.3% 1.81-0.83 60.1% 21.6% 18.3%
2.BATE Barysaŭ 28 818 519 170 129 1573- 678 1727 70.4% 1.92-0.83 63.4% 20.8% 15.8%
3.Šachcior † Salihorsk 34 970 474 229 267 1437- 963 1651 56.7% 1.48-0.99 48.9% 23.6% 27.5%
4.Nioman Hrodna 35 1000 385 250 365 1172-1164 1405 46.8% 1.17-1.16 38.5% 25.0% 36.5%
5.Dynama Brest 35 1000 363 245 392 1288-1301 1334 44.5% 1.29-1.30 36.3% 24.5% 39.2%
6.FC Homieĺ Homieĺ 29 832 325 193 314 1049-1029 1168 46.8% 1.26-1.24 39.1% 23.2% 37.7%
7.FC Viciebsk Viciebsk 29 822 296 210 316 934-1010 1098 44.5% 1.14-1.23 36.0% 25.5% 38.4%
8.Tarpieda-BielAZ Žodzina 26 751 293 200 258 919- 840 1079 47.9% 1.22-1.12 39.0% 26.6% 34.4%
9.Dniapro Mahilioŭ 28 796 274 194 328 989-1062 1016 42.5% 1.24-1.33 34.4% 24.4% 41.2%
10.Slavija Mazyr 23 657 244 150 263 913- 939 882 44.7% 1.39-1.43 37.1% 22.8% 40.0%
11.BielŠyna Babrujsk 23 665 233 150 282 879- 952 849 42.6% 1.32-1.43 35.0% 22.6% 42.4%
12.Naftan Navapolack 24 702 208 151 343 802-1101 775 36.8% 1.14-1.57 29.6% 21.5% 48.9%
13.FC Minsk Minsk 18 538 184 140 214 648- 700 692 42.9% 1.20-1.30 34.2% 26.0% 39.8%
14.Tarpieda Minsk 16 442 158 114 170 481- 520 588 44.3% 1.09-1.18 35.7% 25.8% 38.5%
15.Islač Minsk District 10 298 117 74 107 379- 369 425 47.5% 1.27-1.24 39.3% 24.8% 35.9%
16.FC Sluck-2024 Sluck 12 356 104 86 166 336- 489 398 37.3% 0.94-1.37 29.2% 24.2% 46.6%
17.FC Maladziečna-2018 Maladziečna 13 352 83 81 188 357- 552 330 31.3% 1.01-1.57 23.6% 23.0% 53.4%
18.Dynama-93 † Minsk 6 167 95 37 35 277- 137 322 64.3% 1.66-0.82 56.9% 22.2% 21.0%
19.Partyzan † Minsk 7 197 79 42 76 284- 280 279 47.2% 1.44-1.42 40.1% 21.3% 38.6%
20.Enierhietyk-BDU Minsk 9 260 73 58 129 311- 451 277 35.5% 1.20-1.73 28.1% 22.3% 49.6%
21.Tarpieda-Kadzina † Mahilioŭ 10 270 63 76 131 263- 443 265 32.7% 0.97-1.64 23.3% 28.1% 48.5%
22.Spadarožnik Rečyca 9 238 48 45 145 179- 409 189 26.5% 0.75-1.72 20.2% 18.9% 60.9%
23.FC Haradzieja Haradzieja 5 150 45 50 55 165- 184 185 41.1% 1.10-1.23 30.0% 33.3% 36.7%
24.FC Smarhoń Smarhoń 7 200 43 56 101 168- 333 185 30.8% 0.84-1.67 21.5% 28.0% 50.5%
25.Daryda † Ždanovičy 6 168 44 38 86 165- 252 170 33.7% 0.98-1.50 26.2% 22.6% 51.2%
26.FC Babrujsk † Babrujsk 5 122 44 34 44 119- 145 166 45.4% 0.98-1.19 36.1% 27.9% 36.1%
27.FC Lida Lida 7 182 38 46 98 144- 289 160 29.3% 0.79-1.59 20.9% 25.3% 53.8%
28.Hranit Mikaševičy 4 112 31 35 46 112- 161 128 38.1% 1.00-1.44 27.7% 31.3% 41.1%
29.Ataka † Minsk 3 75 29 16 30 86- 93 103 45.8% 1.15-1.24 38.7% 21.3% 40.0%
30.Ruch Brest 2 60 27 21 12 109- 66 102 56.7% 1.82-1.10 45.0% 35.0% 20.0%
31.Arsienal Dziaržynsk 3 90 22 28 40 74- 113 94 34.8% 0.82-1.26 24.4% 31.1% 44.4%
32.Lakamatyŭ † Minsk 4 112 23 25 64 100- 187 94 28.0% 0.89-1.67 20.5% 22.3% 57.1%
33.Lakamatyŭ † Viciebsk 4 107 22 27 58 82- 181 93 29.0% 0.77-1.69 20.6% 25.2% 54.2%
34.ML Viciebsk 1 30 21 5 04 53- 18 68 75.6% 1.77-0.60 70.0% 16.7% 13.3%
35.Kamunaĺnik Slonim 3 88 15 16 57 65- 190 61 23.1% 0.74-2.16 17.0% 18.2% 64.8%
36.Budaŭnik Staryja Darohi 3 77 14 18 45 48- 117 60 26.0% 0.62-1.52 18.2% 23.4% 58.4%
37.Krumkačy Minsk 2 60 14 16 30 50- 86 58 32.2% 0.83-1.43 23.3% 26.7% 50.0%
38.FC Smaliavičy Smaliavičy 2 60 9 14 37 51- 111 41 22.8% 0.85-1.85 15.0% 23.3% 61.7%
39.Transmaš † Mahilioŭ 1 30 8 4 18 30- 52 28 31.1% 1.00-1.73 26.7% 13.3% 60.0%
40.Pramień † Minsk 1 30 4 12 14 24- 44 24 26.7% 0.80-1.47 13.3% 40.0% 46.7%
41.Savit † Mahilioŭ 1 30 5 6 19 28- 61 21 23.3% 0.93-2.03 16.7% 20.0% 63.3%
42.Svislač-Dach Asipovičy 1 30 4 4 22 24- 74 16 17.8% 0.80-2.47 13.3% 13.3% 73.3%
[S]easons; [G]ames [P]layed; [W]ins; [D]raws; [L]osses; [G]oals [F]or; [G]oals [A]gainst
[Pts] Points; [%pts] Percentage of points earned out of points possible;
[Av. Goals] Average goals for/against; [% W, D, L] - Wins/Draws/Losses-to-Games Percentage
Prepared and maintained by Theodore Dreiman for the Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation
Author: Theodore Dreiman
Last updated: 23 Feb 2026
(C) Copyright Theodore Dreiman and RSSSF 2022/26
You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper
acknowledgement is given to the author. All rights reserved.