Belarus First Level Championships All-Time Table 1992 - 2022
S GP W D L GF- GA Pts %pts Av. Goals % W % D % L
1.Dynama Minsk 32 912 540 199 173 1634- 768 1819 66.5% 1.79-0.84 59.2% 21.8% 19.0%
2.BATE Barysaŭ 25 730 483 151 96 1448- 565 1600 73.1% 1.98-0.77 66.2% 20.7% 13.2%
3.Šachcior Salihorsk 32 912 456 217 239 1368- 878 1585 57.9% 1.50-0.96 50.0% 23.8% 26.2%
4.Nioman Hrodna 32 912 332 237 343 1026-1092 1233 45.1% 1.13-1.20 36.4% 26.0% 37.6%
5.Dynama Brest 32 912 325 229 358 1151-1184 1204 44.0% 1.26-1.30 35.6% 25.1% 39.3%
6.FC Homieĺ Homieĺ 26 744 291 167 286 932- 919 1040 46.6% 1.25-1.24 39.1% 22.4% 38.4%
7.FC Viciebsk Viciebsk 27 762 273 201 288 864- 939 1020 44.6% 1.13-1.23 35.8% 26.4% 37.8%
8.Dniapro Mahilioŭ 27 766 271 185 310 962-1004 998 43.4% 1.26-1.31 35.4% 24.2% 40.5%
9.Tarpieda-BielAZ Žodzina 23 663 250 169 244 798- 771 919 46.2% 1.20-1.16 37.7% 25.5% 36.8%
10.BielŠyna Babrujsk 22 637 230 145 262 858- 891 835 43.7% 1.35-1.40 36.1% 22.8% 41.1%
11.Slavija Mazyr 20 569 208 126 235 800- 844 750 43.9% 1.41-1.48 36.6% 22.1% 41.3%
12.Naftan Navapolack 21 614 189 131 294 712- 945 698 37.9% 1.16-1.54 30.8% 21.3% 47.9%
13.Tarpieda Minsk 16 442 158 114 170 481- 520 588 44.3% 1.09-1.18 35.7% 25.8% 38.5%
14.FC Minsk Minsk 15 450 155 115 180 551- 583 580 43.0% 1.22-1.30 34.4% 25.6% 40.0%
15.Dynama-93 Minsk 6 167 95 37 35 277- 137 322 64.3% 1.66-0.82 56.9% 22.2% 21.0%
16.FC Maladziečna-2000 Maladziečna 12 322 80 79 163 338- 489 319 33.0% 1.05-1.52 24.8% 24.5% 50.6%
17.FC Sluck Sluck 9 268 79 66 123 252- 357 303 37.7% 0.94-1.33 29.5% 24.6% 45.9%
18.Islač Minsk District 7 210 80 48 82 258- 284 288 45.7% 1.23-1.35 38.1% 22.9% 39.0%
19.Partyzan Minsk 7 197 79 42 76 284- 280 279 47.2% 1.44-1.42 40.1% 21.3% 38.6%
20.Tarpieda-Kadzina Mahilioŭ 10 270 63 76 131 263- 443 265 32.7% 0.97-1.64 23.3% 28.1% 48.5%
21.Enierhietyk-BDU Minsk 8 232 66 52 114 286- 409 250 35.9% 1.23-1.76 28.4% 22.4% 49.1%
22.FC Haradzieja Haradzieja 5 150 45 50 55 165- 184 185 41.1% 1.10-1.23 30.0% 33.3% 36.7%
23.Viedryč-97 Rečyca 8 208 46 44 118 167- 327 182 29.2% 0.80-1.57 22.1% 21.2% 56.7%
24.Daryda Ždanovičy 6 168 44 38 86 165- 252 170 33.7% 0.98-1.50 26.2% 22.6% 51.2%
25.FC Babrujsk Babrujsk 5 122 44 34 44 119- 145 166 45.4% 0.98-1.19 36.1% 27.9% 36.1%
26.FC Lida Lida 7 182 38 46 98 144- 289 160 29.3% 0.79-1.59 20.9% 25.3% 53.8%
27.Hranit Mikaševičy 4 112 31 35 46 112- 161 128 38.1% 1.00-1.44 27.7% 31.3% 41.1%
28.Ataka Minsk 3 75 29 16 30 86- 93 103 45.8% 1.15-1.24 38.7% 21.3% 40.0%
29.Ruch Brest 2 60 27 21 12 109- 66 102 56.7% 1.82-1.10 45.0% 35.0% 20.0%
30.FC Smarhoń Smarhoń 4 112 22 35 55 84- 180 101 30.1% 0.75-1.61 19.6% 31.3% 49.1%
31.Lakamatyŭ Minsk 4 112 23 25 64 100- 187 94 28.0% 0.89-1.67 20.5% 22.3% 57.1%
32.Lakamatyŭ Viciebsk 4 107 22 27 58 82- 181 93 29.0% 0.77-1.69 20.6% 25.2% 54.2%
33.Kamunaĺnik Slonim 3 88 15 16 57 65- 190 61 23.1% 0.74-2.16 17.0% 18.2% 64.8%
34.Budaŭnik Staryja Darohi 3 77 14 18 45 48- 117 60 26.0% 0.62-1.52 18.2% 23.4% 58.4%
35.Krumkačy Minsk 2 60 14 16 30 50- 86 58 32.2% 0.83-1.43 23.3% 26.7% 50.0%
36.FC Smaliavičy Smaliavičy 2 60 9 14 37 51- 111 41 22.8% 0.85-1.85 15.0% 23.3% 61.7%
37.Transmaš Mahilioŭ 1 30 8 4 18 30- 52 28 31.1% 1.00-1.73 26.7% 13.3% 60.0%
38.Pramień Minsk 1 30 4 12 14 24- 44 24 26.7% 0.80-1.47 13.3% 40.0% 46.7%
39.Arsienal Dziaržynsk 1 30 5 8 17 18- 42 23 25.6% 0.60-1.40 16.7% 26.7% 56.7%
40.Savit Mahilioŭ 1 30 5 6 19 28- 61 21 23.3% 0.93-2.03 16.7% 20.0% 63.3%
41.Svislač-Dach Asipovičy 1 30 4 4 22 24- 74 16 17.8% 0.80-2.47 13.3% 13.3% 73.3%
42.Spadarožnik Rečyca 1 30 2 1 27 12- 82 07 07.8% 0.40-2.73 06.7% 03.3% 90.0%
[S]easons; [G]ames [P]layed; [W]ins; [D]raws; [L]osses; [G]oals [F]or; [G]oals [A]gainst
[Pts] Points; [%pts] Percentage of points earned out of points possible;
[Av. Goals] Average goals for/against; [% W, D, L] - Wins/Draws/Losses-to-Games Percentage
Prepared and maintained by Theodore Dreiman for the Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation
Author: Theodore Dreiman
Last updated: 5 Jan 2022
(C) Copyright Theodore Dreiman and RSSSF 2022/23
You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper
acknowledgement is given to the author. All rights reserved.